"The Pursuit of Prosperity"

 

Kentucky Long Range Planning Discussion

Old Capitol Building, Frankfort, Kentucky

November 15, 1994

 

CMichal Smith-Mello

 

New Paradigms: Globalization of the economyCexports represent as much as 90% of economic growth.

 

Changing work place dynamics: intellectual capital, teamwork. Rapid-fire advances in technology.

A Shifting Economic Floor-

 

CoalCrising environmentalism (It's been said there is a 300-year reserve, but access is limited to 20-30 years. Also, there's a waning focus on U.S. energy independence.

Though there's now record coal production/many jobs are being lost through layoffs, shut-downs.

 

FarmingCRelatively undiversified in Kentucky: tobacco (27%); cattle (22%) imports/use is down tax target. Tobacco is affected by: 1)

 

ManufacturingCrepresents 19% of ________ jobs; of the gross state product, it represents (22-25%) which exceeds the national average)

Kentucky's "New strength:" the high-wage auto industry.

 

There are many inherent weaknesses.

 

Sustained OptionsCForest Products (Kentucky produces 11% of these U.S. (raw) products) but Kentucky trails surrounding states in forest industry establishments. Thus, we produce the rough lumber, not the finished lumber products. Kentucky's prime hardwoods are being sold off.

 

Tourism Development. Represented $1.9 billion in revenues in '80/$5.7 billion in 1992. The industry is not an antidote to poverty; it is characterized by unemployment. (These businesses are seasonal by nature) There is a need to emphasize local ownership.

 

TechnologyC"one of the over-arching forces" in Kentucky. Kentucky has 8.2% employed in "high-tech" industries; chemical, automotive, etc. Kentucky in the mid-range among southern states in technology-related industry.

 

Points of Opportunity - R&D -invested industry (we're building a base)

Kentucky's "information highway." Bio-tech and pharmaceuticals. Advanced materials; environmental remediation

 

Liabilities - our under-educated, inadequately trained workforce. Undercapitalized firms

 

"Chasing the American Dream"

The employer-employee contract is changing:

Cjobs are more tenuous (due to downsizing)

Cbenefits are declining (out-sourcing is becoming prevalent)

Cstructural shifts to low-wage jobs are occurring

C"stagnant inflation" (Kentucky have been wages behind the national average since 1974.

CMore "working poor" (10% in Kentucky ____6%; versus the U.S.Cand in Kentucky, especially

among black, urban, female populations.

CIncreasing "time poverty" (i.e., working two jobs to get by)

CRising income unequally in the U.S. and Kentucky.

CIt's the worst since 1947.

CThe shrinking middle class produces a broad-based impact on communities.

 

David Hawpe. Darrell GilliamCWe're already dealing with two Kentuckys. In 1960, Paducah, Henderson, Owensboro, the I-64 corridor/county, Meade, Ashland, Northern Kentucky in 1990; the rest of the state caught up, except Appalachia (in general) and Ohio County. By 1990, the same was true for all states. Every one had done well except Eastern Kentucky.

 

We're not doing well in terms of how income and employment is "done" in this state. We have:

1) Need to address the human infrastructure in Eastern Kentucky.

2) Great need for physical infrastructure development in same areas.

 

Ken OilschlagerC"High paid migrating workers." That's what we economic development professionals" are for. For years we got by selling low taxes and cheap labor. Community development and quality of life issues were not important to industries them.

 

Education has had a great impact on usCin the positive and the negative! We must push forward on its importanceCdespite those other needs pressing in on us now: job loss, displacements, and many more.

We must now expect "re-training" three to ten times in our lives!

 

Must continue all these. "None of these things is a destination anymoreCjust a great journey." When I started "community development" was all those things that didn't relate to the "economic development" I did. I was a "Great buffalo hunter"Cseeking only those major industrial prospects.

 

Today, we have to be concerned about everythingCevery aspect of community. The keys are "Grassroots:" We must create leadership from within.CNot up-down anymore. We must build capacity in order to do that! We must help smaller, less prosperous communities deal with change! The bigger ones can largely take care of themselves.

 

Change will impact community in different ways. We've got a lot of assisting to do; we must address a lot of areas.

 

Jeff HallC"Ag Project 2000" is a project to link agricultural interests and consumers. There has been declining numbers of farmers since 1900. But food costs have gone down as the number of farms have.

Sixty years ago, the U.S. Government got involved with farmsCthrough commodity supportsCand many farmers have not benefited. "We need to focus more on communities than commodities."

But what do we want: farms or production?

 

Farmers will produce for income, not for tradition! Tobacco provides money! Thus, the central problem of Kentucky farmers: to diversify. Show the market! They will.

 

We've been beaten to the draw so often. In Kentucky, every four years we change the Commissioner of Agriculture. North Carolinians has had the same one for thirty years! That's stability! A program not a new program every four years is what's needed!

 

Consumers don't care where grocery products come fromCBUT about availability, price, convenience.

Farmers need to find out what needs to be produced. We need a leadership group within agriculture. Then if it doesn't get done, someone is responsible! Who's responsible now? A consortium is farming. It involves the Commissioner, Ag 2000, the Universities, Farm Bureau, and others.

 

Most Kentucky communities are rural; that's where our natural resources exist. Seventy-five percent of Kentucky farmers rely on non-farm income. Of 90,000 farmers, just 10% produce 80% of the agriculture income. Many farmers' issues are same as those you care aboutCthey're community issues.

Small business is the backbone of Kentucky commerce.

 

$750 billion is spent on farm-related produce in the U.S. Only 20% goes to farmers, 80% goes to others in food production, processing, distribution and sales.

 

Ken CurrentCMr. Current had a key role in forming the Kentucky World Trade Center.)

I once closed a 1,500-employee plant in a town of 8,000. That community had a crisis; they pulled together and the result was "a fabulous success story" for that community.

 

These charts, statistics make me believe that Kentucky has a crisis, and Kentucky needs to pull together.

The "international scene"CThere's no greater force than economic involvement in the world scene. It's tremendous way for Kentucky to emerge from these problems.

 

Foreign-made clothes, cars, appliances, food, etc. dominate our existence!

 

Hardees, Porter Paint. Pinkerton. Makers Mark. Kentucky's old standbys. These and many new businessesCall are "world" companiesCand are foreign-owned.

 

Is Kentucky participating in this world market? Kentucky's exports are growing faster than the U.S. BUT! put this in perspective: the U.S. since '75 has had a continuously growing trade deficit! It was $15 billion in '93 alone. U.S. exports 8% of GNP. That percentage equals Bangladesh's.

Germany "exports" 30% of its GNP; France, 22%; Japan 19%.

 

We're not very "internationalized!" 14% of Kentucky businesses export; 80% do not! Why? Lack of knowledge, commitment, need. We need to wake up. The world market is $3.6 trillion. It's growing three times faster than the rest of world economy. The U.S. gets only 13% of that $3.6 trillion. Kentucky's share is sixteen thousandths of 1%.

 

We need policies, strategic to take advantage of the free trade agreements.

Exports create jobs! In Kentucky, the 90,000 jobs are already directly related to exports.

It doesn't take complicated programsCjust selling!

 

It's not easy to "hold market share" or increase share of market! Everyone's competing hard!

The handwriting's on the wall. We're losing jobs in all our key economiesCtobacco, mining, horse industry. (Brazil and others are competing hard to take away even the horse industry!)

States must be aggressive, bold in their efforts.

 

If we don't go after markets, some one else willCand after "our" markets.

 

First, we saw emerging "national" economies. Now, we see emerging international economies.

 

Karen Armstrong-CummingsC

1) Globalization: it's not just the economy but our world views. These are expanding beyond the place we know. We must now think of "sustaining the global environment"

 

We're advising the former Soviet nations, and Third World nations. They're all thinking of stronger environmental contracts. Kentucky is exporting "environmental measures."

 

2) Changing Policy Options: We must think leadership, community development, and infrastructure!

 

We must harvest resources in a sustainable way. We must forge partnerships. "We must learn how to live in long-term measures." "Scientists" in Europe are in charge of environmental measures. Public Relations people do it in Canada. "Lawyers do it in America." We fight about these issues; we litigate our way through it! We must institutionalize a new way of thinking about this.

 

3) Mechanisms That Are In Place: Many opportunities are there: "sustainability" and "long-term thinking." Participation in local community efforts are crucial. We must learn to do that: build our civic capital-and not always look to Frankfort and Washington.

 

We must involve the young. They're the people who'll be dealing with this in the years to come. Programs like this should be included in KERA.

 

David Hawpe: The media can also participate, butCas a:

1) Direct participant? or a

2) Detached reporter/commentator?

 

These are now competing ideas in American journalism. Newspapers are the vehicle of public debate. They can serve either as:

a) ConvenerCand even implementer, or as a

b) Detached dissenter, independent reporter.

 

The media is "arguing" over their role. Should it focus on either of these two points:

1) The fact of economic/moral degradation ... or offer practical argument?

I doubt people will accept practical arguments. Rather, we have individualism

and free-market hegomoryCno public altruism.

2) Where are we in Kentucky creating a critical mass of scholarship and research? Do

we fear a system of education not characterized by excellence? We have "access,"

but at enormous costCat the price of excellence!

 

Scourging the political monarch of Kentucky is self-aggrandizingCbut not very helpful.

 

Questions and Answers - Education.

 

Is there a causal relationship? How do we harness this? Is it not just educate the people and the jobs will come? As in, "Build... and they will come"??

 

Everything's flattening outCdue to automation. But regardless, jobs for the un-educated are gone!

It takes talent, education. Menial jobs are now done by machines and the Third World. Critical thinking skills, no fear to tackle problems, basic skills, a good work ethic. That's what people hire for. We must think of education as a process, not a destination.

 

How do we provide the leadership we need in Kentucky?

 

Training programsCteach people to become involved. But these need to be a component Ca conscious effort to empowerCin all we do.

 

The responsibility of the Press? First, get over the schizophrenia; it influences people in a powerful way. You should influence people in a positive way. You're a major player, long-term. In Myrtle Beach, SC, the newspaper was the impetus to help move the community forward.

 

The media should be involved in solutions! Yes, but journalists are trained to be independent observersCnot embrace more active roles. But it's worth discussing.

 

Conscious effort is required to empower people. Democracy is a painful, slow processCbut we want quick, simple answers. Change takes time. Encourage people to sustain gains, hold on, build on existing gains.

 

WRAP-UP/Dr. Forrest CalicoC

 

Commenter: Kentucky needs to access and support its border states' initiatives too.

Leadership? Leadership Louisville's been going for 15 years. At the state level, there's Leadership Kentucky, which has just completed its tenth year.

 

We've got to think about "Process:" Today, we've projected trends; we would also look at extremes.

Cthe best case and worst case scenarios we can devise. We've looked today in the context of rather narrow confines. "We make a big mistake when we simply project past experience to the future." We must envision:Cboth outrageous opportunities and atastrophes.

 

Also in the "real world" of empowerment, think of resourcesCtheir limited natureCand how people can get their hands of them. The need media access for example.

 

Dr. CalicoC

The "givens" are these:

1 - Kentucky is ruralCand it's highly distressed

2 - The state's demography is changing rapidly

3 - The stage on which we perform is a global one

4 - It's clear that our needs are enormous!

5 - It's clear that we're talking about a process, not a destination

 

Many pluses have been noted:

! enterprize zones

! family

! lifelong learning

! collaboration

! data/information highway

! KERA

 

Coupled with these is a

! Litany of problems:

! poverty

! 2-tiers

! abuse/neglect

! waste

! political hands crisis orientation

! unprepared work force needed leadership

! and many more: "a litany of social pathology."

 

Solutions must be integrated, collaborative and interwoven. Effectiveness may be translated

as quality: doing what we intend to do. Quality/effectiveness reduces cost.

 

Solutions arise from within communities of people which have effective leadership. Kentucky does not have a good track on this. For effective community leaders, "systems thinking" is required. Our first priority is to help leaders learn applied systems thinking. For example, great education system with no job opportunities at the end is bad. Today is a beginning. The real work comes as we seek to collaborate.

 

We must stop to build that bridge rather than just moving on as we always have. The future depends on what we decide.

 

Notes by Ronald Logsdon